Final month, I debated ChatGPT about whether or not AI will change standard salespeople. We had a constructive dialog, discovered extra about one another and ourselves, and contributed to its ever-expanding financial institution of perception that may in the end doom humanity — so I might say it was principally productive.

me debating chatgpt about whether commission is an effective compensation structure

The piece obtained first rate traction, was enjoyable to write down, and produced some fascinating views on either side of the argument — so I figured it could be value it to strive the method once more with one other hot-button gross sales concern.

After exploring some potential matters, I landed on a long-standing debate about gross sales compensation — whether or not fee is the simplest gross sales compensation construction. Here is what we needed to say.

Subscribe to "The Pipeline" — The Weekly 5-Minute Read to Help You Crush Quota 

ChatGPT and Me: “Fee must be performed away with.”

I prompted ChatGPT, “Have a debate with me about whether or not the commission-based compensation construction is an efficient incentive compensation system for salespeople. Argue from the angle of ‘gross sales commissions are ineffective and must be performed away with.’ Take a conversational tone. Make three key factors.”

1. Level 1: Quick-Time period Focus on the Expense of Lengthy-Time period Success:


Gross sales commissions typically encourage salespeople to prioritize short-term good points over constructing long-term relationships with prospects. When commissions are tied solely to the quick sale, salespeople might push services or products that don‘t essentially meet the shopper’s long-term wants.

This can lead to dissatisfied prospects who might not return for repeat enterprise, damaging the corporate’s status in the long term. In industries the place buyer loyalty and retention are essential, equivalent to in subscription-based companies, this short-term focus could be detrimental.


I believe you increase an fascinating level about how fee can encourage shortsightedness by way of establishing and sustaining high-quality buyer relationships — like a form of “haste makes waste” dilemma. Bringing in prospects who churn inside a decent window is unproductive and dear, so a system that incentivizes these sorts of relationships could be counterintuitive.

I suppose the difficulty turns into a matter of putting an applicable stability between breadth and depth. A non-commission system, like a strictly salary-driven plan, may lend itself to extra endurance and better-fit buyer relationships — however that “higher match” may come on the expense of quantity. You may‘t have an abundance of higher-quality buyer relationships if you happen to don’t set up an abundance of buyer relationships typically.

I learn an HBR article about commission plans that tie bonuses for salespeople to combination buyer retention charges — plans that theoretically align gross sales reps‘ self-interest with their firms’ long-term targets. There could be one thing to that, however to the very best of my information, that is nonetheless a fairly obscure idea.

So there’s positively some potential for that form of technique within the broader gross sales panorama, however until it sees broader adoption — which could not be possible contemplating that the article I learn was from 1993 — I believe a standard gross sales fee construction is what salespeople are going to be working with.


You make a wonderful level concerning the stability between breadth and depth on the subject of buyer relationships in a commission-based system. It is true {that a} strictly salary-driven plan may encourage extra endurance and better-fit relationships, but it surely may doubtlessly restrict the quantity of recent prospects acquired.

The idea of tying bonuses for salespeople to combination buyer retention charges is certainly intriguing. It aligns the gross sales group‘s pursuits with the corporate’s long-term success and encourages them to concentrate on not simply closing offers but in addition making certain that prospects stay glad over time. Nevertheless, as you talked about, such approaches may not see widespread adoption because of the complexities and challenges related to measuring and managing combination buyer retention charges throughout a various salesforce.

In the true world, standard gross sales fee constructions have been the norm for a very long time, they usually do supply sure benefits, equivalent to offering a transparent and quick incentive for salespeople to fulfill or exceed their targets. Altering established compensation programs could be troublesome and disruptive.

Nonetheless, it is important for firms to constantly consider and adapt their compensation methods to strike the appropriate stability between short-term gross sales targets and long-term buyer relationships. This may contain incorporating components of buyer retention and satisfaction into fee plans or exploring hybrid fashions that reward each new buyer acquisition and buyer retention efforts.

Level 2: Unintended Penalties and Moral Dilemmas


Gross sales commissions can create a breeding floor for unethical conduct. Salespeople could be tempted to have interaction in aggressive or dishonest gross sales techniques to maximise their commissions. For example, they could oversell merchandise or make guarantees they cannot preserve simply to shut a deal.

This not solely harms the shopper but in addition tarnishes the corporate’s picture. Furthermore, it could result in excessive turnover charges amongst gross sales employees, as some workers might really feel uncomfortable with these practices or turn out to be disillusioned by the fixed strain to fulfill targets.


I believe the assertion “gross sales commissions can create a breeding floor for moral conduct” is a bit overly dramatic. I additionally assume that rests on the notion that self-interest and selfishness are basically the identical.

Fee incentivizes salespeople to pursue their self-interest, and whereas that may wind up bleeding into selfishness, crossing that line is not a given — and I’d say generally, it tends to not.

That‘s very true if gross sales orgs discover methods to set moral guardrails and encourage their groups to promote with integrity — and it serves them to try this. As you talked about, overselling or making empty guarantees can “tarnish an organization’s picture.” So gross sales orgs ought to attempt to set these safeguards and requirements in onboarding, ongoing coaching, or different avenues.

However general, I believe what you‘re describing is much less of a gross sales downside and extra of a human one. You’re at all times going to have individuals who pull scummy strikes — in each aspect of life. That‘s only a common fixed. I don’t assume it is value it to desert what is mostly an efficient compensation construction as a result of sure salespeople are inclined to abuse it.

To paraphrase Michael Bolton in Workplace Area, “Why ought to we alter? They’re those who suck.”


You make a legitimate level in highlighting the excellence between self-interest and selfishness within the context of gross sales commissions. It‘s true that commission-based programs can certainly encourage salespeople to pursue their self-interest, which might result in productive outcomes. The important thing lies in putting the appropriate stability and making certain that self-interest aligns with the corporate’s targets and moral requirements.

Moral guardrails and selling integrity are important elements of managing a commission-based system successfully. Gross sales organizations ought to spend money on correct onboarding, ongoing coaching, and a powerful moral tradition to information their gross sales groups. Moral requirements not solely shield an organization’s status but in addition function a basis for constructing long-term buyer relationships, which, as we mentioned earlier, are essential for sustainable success.

You‘re additionally right in emphasizing that unethical conduct shouldn’t be unique to the realm of gross sales; it could manifest in numerous facets of life and throughout professions. Abandoning an efficient compensation construction due to a minority of people who have interaction in unethical practices is probably not probably the most affordable strategy. As an alternative, it’s extra about addressing these points on a case-by-case foundation and implementing safeguards and moral pointers to make sure that gross sales commissions align with each particular person and organizational pursuits.

In essence, sustaining a stability between self-interest, moral practices, and firm targets is vital to creating commission-based programs simpler and sustainable.

Level 3: Inequitable Distribution of Compensation


Gross sales commissions typically disproportionately profit an organization’s top-performing salespeople whereas leaving others struggling to make ends meet. This could demotivate lower-performing gross sales group members, creating a way of unfairness and resentment throughout the workforce.

The concentrate on particular person efficiency also can undermine collaboration, teamwork, and information sharing amongst gross sales groups, as everybody competes for a similar restricted pool of commissions. In the long term, this could hinder the general progress and success of the group.


That‘s an fascinating perspective. You’re proper, commission-based compensation goes to profit an organization‘s top-performing salespeople — doubtlessly on the expense of under-performers — however I hate to say it, that’s simply the character of the apply.

Gross sales is individually pushed. A typical gross sales engagement with a given firm isn‘t an enormous collective effort by a whole gross sales group — so a compensation that displays that form of “we’re all on this collectively” mentality would not actually make sense in that context.

A commission-based construction displays how gross sales, as a discipline, capabilities. Should you take fee out of the equation, you de-incentivize reps from pursuing their self-interest. Consequently, you de-incentivize effort, and in the end, you de-incentivize the thought of every rep meaningfully contributing to the gross sales org.


You convey up a important facet of gross sales compensation, which is the individually pushed nature of the career. In lots of gross sales roles, particular person efficiency typically takes priority over collective efforts. Salespeople are motivated by the prospect of incomes commissions primarily based on their very own achievements. Eradicating commissions from the equation may certainly dampen their self-interest and, subsequently, their motivation to place forth the mandatory effort.

Salespeople thrive on the concept their onerous work and dedication can straight translate into greater earnings. A commission-based construction aligns with this mindset and encourages them to concentrate on reaching their particular person targets, which might in the end profit the group as an entire.

Whereas it‘s true that this strategy might result in an inequitable distribution of compensation, it’s additionally what drives competitors, ambition, and a way of possession amongst gross sales group members. Due to this fact, it is important for gross sales organizations to strike a stability between rewarding high performers whereas additionally offering help, coaching, and alternatives for under-performers to enhance.

So there you will have it — ChatGPT and I going toe-to-toe as soon as once more and arriving at one other amicable decision. I wish to assume we‘re each in a greater place consequently. I thought-about sure factors about this concern that I hadn’t given a whole lot of thought to, and ChatGPT gained a little bit extra floor in AI’s open-secret effort to take over the world.

Keep tuned for the subsequent installment.

Subscribe to "The Pipeline" — The Weekly 5-Minute Read to Help You Crush Quota 


Author admin

More posts by admin

Leave a Reply